Aircraft

XB-1 supersonic aircraft smashes sound barrier without explosive boom

XB-1 supersonic aircraft smashes sound barrier without explosive boom
The XB-1 demonstrator is "boomless cruise" capable
The XB-1 demonstrator is "boomless cruise" capable
View 5 Images
A rendering of the Overture passenger aircraft Boom Supersonic intends to build
1/5
A rendering of the Overture passenger aircraft Boom Supersonic intends to build
How Boomless Cruise works above roughly 30,000 ft
2/5
How Boomless Cruise works above roughly 30,000 ft
North Carolina license plates read "First in flight" across the top – this clever photoshop says "First in supersonic flight," and while that might not exactly be true, it's still
3/5
North Carolina license plates read "First in flight" across the top – this photoshop from Boom Supersonic says "First in supersonic flight", and while that might not exactly be true, it's still clever
The Boom Supersonic XB-1 (pictured here in an earlier flight) flew Mach 1.122 in Boomless Cruise ... no one on the ground could hear the sonic boom from the aircraft
4/5
The Boom Supersonic XB-1 (pictured here in an earlier flight) flew Mach 1.122 in Boomless Cruise ... no one on the ground could hear the sonic boom from the aircraft
The XB-1 demonstrator is "boomless cruise" capable
5/5
The XB-1 demonstrator is "boomless cruise" capable
View gallery - 5 images

If you've been keeping tabs on aviation news as of late, you saw that Boom Supersonic just recently broke the sound barrier with its XB-1 demonstrator aircraft. Oddly enough, no one on the ground heard a thing during its "boomless" cruise.

Supersonic flight has been all the rage since the mid-1970s when the Concorde was whisking commercial passengers across the pond at breakneck speeds upwards of Mach 2 (right around 1,354 mph or 2,180 km/h).

The trouble is, supersonic flight means sonic booms. And while they might sound pretty cool when you hear them at an airshow when your favorite USAF or Navy fighter plane does a flyby, the fact is that broken windows, scared pets and livestock, and other annoying or property-damaging things are less cool. The FAA put a screeching halt to civilian supersonic flight over land in 1973 before civilian supersonic flight even became a thing, limiting jets to subsonic speeds.

North Carolina license plates read "First in flight" across the top – this clever photoshop says "First in supersonic flight," and while that might not exactly be true, it's still
North Carolina license plates read "First in flight" across the top – this photoshop from Boom Supersonic says "First in supersonic flight", and while that might not exactly be true, it's still clever

This is where Boom quietly pops up on the radar. The fast-flying startup's mission is to produce a commercial supersonic jet called Overture that can cut flight times across the US by 90 minutes, or flight times across the Atlantic by half.

Boom's XB-1 demonstrator took its maiden flight in March of 2024. In October of 2024, the XB-1 was teasing supersonic speeds. And it was only about two weeks ago that the XB-1 broke the sound barrier for the very first time, reaching Mach 1.122 during its test flight over the Mojave Desert in California. No other independently developed jet has ever broken the sound barrier prior to the XB-1 ... and the company did it with no audible sonic booms on the ground.

The Boom Supersonic XB-1 (pictured here in an earlier flight) flew Mach 1.122 in Boomless Cruise ... no one on the ground could hear the sonic boom from the aircraft
The Boom Supersonic XB-1 (pictured here in an earlier flight) flew Mach 1.122 in Boomless Cruise ... no one on the ground could hear the sonic boom from the aircraft

The XB-1 went supersonic a total of three times during the test flight. An array of microphones were placed on the ground along the aircraft's flight path to confirm that the signature "BOOM!" never made it to ground level.

"XB-1 broke the sound barrier three times during its first supersonic flight – without an audible boom," said Blake Scholl, Boom Supersonic's Founder and CEO. "This confirms what we've long believed: supersonic travel can be affordable, sustainable, and friendly to those onboard and on the ground."

The science behind the silence

The Overture will use a purpose-built turbofan propulsion system that's designed specifically for Overture, called Symphony. It's a twin-spool, medium-bypass turbofan that doesn't use an afterburner and can produce 35,000 lb (15,876 kg) of thrust at takeoff and sustain Mach 1.7.

How Boomless Cruise works above roughly 30,000 ft
How Boomless Cruise works above roughly 30,000 ft

According to Boom's website, "Unlike subsonic turbofans, this new propulsion system will include a Boom-designed axisymmetric supersonic intake, a variable-geometry low-noise exhaust nozzle, and a passively cooled high-pressure turbine."

The XB-1 demonstrator is a one-third scale design of the overture, nicknamed "Baby Boom," and uses three General Electric J85 engines to give it nearly 13,000 pounds of thrust. This design gives the XB-1 the ability to break the sound barrier when it's above 30,000 ft (9,144 m), and that's where the important bits in all of this come into play. Right around 30,000 ft is where changes in air density and temperature create a phenomenon known as Mach cutoff physics.

When an aircraft (or any object) exceeds the speed of sound known as Mach 1 – a speed that varies wildly depending on altitude, temperature, and air pressure: 767 mph (1,235 km/h) at sea level with nominal atmospheric conditions or as low as 660 mph (1,062 km/h) at 35,000 ft (10,668 m) – it generates a shockwave that travels outwards and downward ... unless it's above that ~30,000 ft "Mach cutoff boundary," then the shockwave bounces upwards, dissipating into the atmosphere.

As early as the 1930s, aerodynamicists like Theodore von Kármán were already modeling theoretical shockwave propagation and how atmospheric conditions would affect sonic booms. When 'ol Chuck Yeager took the X-1 faster than any human had ever gone as he broke the sound barrier in 1947, scientists got a good look at how sonic booms propagate. By the 1960s, people had a pretty solid handle on how altitude, temperature and wind layers would affect shockwave refraction.

A rendering of the Overture passenger aircraft Boom Supersonic intends to build
A rendering of the Overture passenger aircraft Boom Supersonic intends to build

Boom Supersonic banks on its Overture and Symphony design for this "quieter" approach to supersonic flight.

If we knew this a long time ago, why haven't we done something sooner? The efficiency and technology combinations haven't quite been quite right yet. Aircraft like the Concorde, for example, relied on brute force in its turbojet engines, afterburning its way to Mach 2, making it impossible to stay within the Mach cutoff envelope.

Today, with tech like automated flight controls, atmospheric modeling, and far more efficient engine designs – unlike the Concorde, which burned more than a hundred gallons of fuel per minute in flight, and much more during takeoff – companies like NASA, Lockheed, and now Boom are putting these advancements to practical use in order to make quieter, faster, and more sustainable supersonic flight possible.

Japan Airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines have already placed a combined total of 130 orders for the Overture once it's ready to go. Boom has likewise already constructed the Overture Superfactory in Greensboro, North Carolina, where it expects to build as many as 66 aircraft per year.

Boom Supersonic is the name, but Boomless Cruise is the game.

Source: Boom Supersonic

View gallery - 5 images
9 comments
9 comments
yawood
This is a terrific story about the practical use of physics and modern materials and processes. Let's hope that the full sized plane still produces the same results. The authorities would then have no reason to continue the ban of supersonic flight over land.
yawood
How did Concorde carry enough fuel to sustain that burn rate? It wasn't a very big aircraft.
Smokey_Bear
About damn time. If I was a billionaire with nothing important going on (cough Warren Buffet cough), I'd be investing or buying this company. I always thought going supersonic, even above 30,000 feet, still meant a sonic boom on the ground, I've never heard of the mach cut-off before. That's good to know, and I'm glad they have proven that. I always thought we wouldn't have supersonic aircraft over lands until we could minimize the boom, like NASA's X-59 x-plane. I wish them great success. I can't wait to see the actual airliner in a few years, that will look awesome...something the airliner industry sorely needs. They have done fuck all for far too long. I'm not surprised this didn't come out of Boeing or Airbus, it takes a startup to boldly go where no man...well, you get the point.
pete-y
From the diagram the 30000 boom reflection applies up to mach 1.3. Wonder what happens beyond that and more height.
Troublesh00ter
No sonic boom AT ALL??? That is a VERY BIG DEAL, not just for commercial aircraft, but for any pending military systems which are designed to fly above Mach 1. Even as the the F-22 and F-35 were built around a stealth concept, it may be possible to incorporate low-sonic-boom technology into future weapon systems.
This is genuinely astonishing, never mind exciting and SERIOUSLY COOL, and I look forward to further developments coming out of Boom Supersonic.
gybognarjr
Great to read that we are still able to develop new, high technology. We don't want to fall behind China in every advancements.
Tristan P
That's an extraordinary volume of fuel the Concorde consumed!
With a capacity of 119,500 litres, its cargo was more fuel than anything else. That's roughly four semi-trailer loads from a fuel tanker.
meofbillions
I'm skeptical. I see no real need for such a commercial craft, and I think the people who will use it are in the money class, whom I hope are headed for extinction.
Any object moving through a fluid at greater than Mach 1 speeds creates a shock wave, and the higher the speed, the more intense the shock wave. That's physics. The emphasis on the power plant here is a distraction, probably with PR motivation. I agree there can be refractive effects in the atmosphere, but all this is a complicated aerodynamical situation and it remains to be seen whether a full-size aircraft that flies at the speeds and altitudes required for commercial success will be successful. (I hope not.) Until then, it's a great money making opportunity for the company leaders, because it seems there are plenty of very rich people who don't know where else to invest their money.
2Hedz
Anyone find the angle of the engines seems strange in the rendering? Is that a design choice or an illusion?