Energy

Europe plays catch-up to China with gargantuan wind turbine

Europe plays catch-up to China with gargantuan wind turbine
Siemens Gamesa could claim the title of the world's largest wind turbine - but China's Dongfang is hot on its heels
Siemens Gamesa could claim the title of the world's largest wind turbine - but China's Dongfang is hot on its heels
View 4 Images
Siemens Gamesa could claim the title of the world's largest wind turbine - but China's Dongfang is hot on its heels
1/4
Siemens Gamesa could claim the title of the world's largest wind turbine - but China's Dongfang is hot on its heels
Dongfang employees standing by the nacelle of the company's 26-MW turbine
2/4
Dongfang employees standing by the nacelle of the company's 26-MW turbine
Immensely complex structural engineering goes into making sure these massive machines can brave the elements
3/4
Immensely complex structural engineering goes into making sure these massive machines can brave the elements
It's hard to imagine just how large these turbines actually turn out to be; shown here is a Siemens Gamesa 14-222 DD that's a lot smaller than the company's latest prototype
4/4
It's hard to imagine just how large these turbines actually turn out to be; shown here is a Siemens Gamesa 14-222 DD that's a lot smaller than the company's latest prototype
View gallery - 4 images

When it comes to clean energy, offshore wind turbine farms are where we see some of the largest machines on the planet. There's an enormous new prototype coming up in Denmark, but as it turns out, it's not nearly big enough to hold a candle to what China's got cooking.

A new offshore turbine prototype from Siemens Gamesa, which was slated to be installed at the Østerild test site in Denmark, has now been confirmed by the Danish Energy Agency as a 21.5-MW affair.

That's from a prototype certificate issued by the agency, and the figure is nothing to sneeze at. With a rotor diameter of 905 ft (276 m), it's positively ginormous. Sadly, we haven't yet got eyes on it.

It's hard to imagine just how large these turbines actually turn out to be; shown here is a Siemens Gamesa 14-222 DD that's a lot smaller than the company's latest prototype
It's hard to imagine just how large these turbines actually turn out to be; shown here is a Siemens Gamesa 14-222 DD that's a lot smaller than the company's latest prototype

Early last year, Siemens Gimensa was certain its project would feature "the world's most powerful offshore wind turbine prototype."

Indeed, its plan involved a bigger turbine than the current world's largest one set up in China by Mingyang Smart Energy in September 2024 – a 20-MW monster with a rotor diameter of 853-958 ft (260-292 m) sweeping a total area larger than 12 NFL football fields.

However, as Windpower Monthly noted, while the Østerild test facility has shown footage of Siemens' prototype turbine being transported there for installation late last month, it's probably going to be a while before it's erected and functional.

And that means it's likely that China will beat Denmark to the punch: last October, Dongfang Electric Corporation confirmed it rolled a giant 26-MW turbine off its own production line in the country's southern Fujian Province.

That behemoth is said to be a dizzying 1,115 ft tall (340 m) – higher than the Eiffel Tower – with a blade diameter of 1,107 ft (310 m). The company counts its fully localized design and manufacturing a major achievement – but it hasn't yet announced details around how far it's gotten with installing it.

Dongfang employees standing by the nacelle of the company's 26-MW turbine
Dongfang employees standing by the nacelle of the company's 26-MW turbine

So to be clear, if Siemens gets its prototype in Denmark up and running before Dongfang, it'll indeed be the largest functioning turbine on the planet – but it'll likely be dwarfed by the Chinese giant in short order.

That's not a knock on Siemens by any means. The company says its prototype will supply enough green energy to power around 7,000 Danish households annually, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 55,424 tons a year.

Immensely complex structural engineering goes into making sure these massive machines can brave the elements
Immensely complex structural engineering goes into making sure these massive machines can brave the elements

Regardless of which firm comes out on top, it'll be a big win for wind energy, and for the companies' respective countries as they strive to reach their emissions control targets.

Source: Siemens Gamesa via Windpower Monthly

View gallery - 4 images
5 comments
5 comments
BarronScout
I wonder about survivability in the North Atlantic (even between UK and Denmark)? I wonder about the environmental impact of the manufacture of the turbine (fan) blades and drive hub? I wonder about service life and maintenance impact on environment?
Real questions brought up as companies try to scale these things up ever bigger. Limitations of blade size - as they get bigger eventually the tips go super sonic. How do you even reach them to service? How much of a navigation hazard do they become (aeronautical and nautical)? And can we ever get enough of them installed to make a meaningful impact, or are they just for show (environmental cred)?
I like more localized solutions than this - there are several (ironically named) "tulip" bladed wind turbine designs that be placed in public spaces and at point of use.
guzmanchinky
Amazing leaps forward for the whole planet!
Loc
I wonder the same as BarronScout does. As well as the additional cost of manufacturing, installing as well. They need to spend even more money on fusion. The wind isn't going to get it done.
Karmudjun
I don't wonder any of those things about huge wind turbines. If the tips were intended to go supersonic instead of be locked down when winds get too high, then the nacelle would have generators within that could handle the extreme RPMs. Instead the tips NEVER go supersonic and the generator is geared to spin at the slow speed of the blades. survivability? Site Survey gave engineers the parameters so they can overengineer. The environmental impact of large blade manufacture is improving - but it is a tremendous carbon footprint. 55K tons of CO2 avoidance is not just cred, and up to 7K Danish homes might agree. Last year we peaked at 37.41 billion tons CO2. Just another 700K of these and we might match the CO2 emissions levels.
meofbillions
Like others here, I can't help but wonder if these monster machines are a result of some kind of human mania. It wouldn't surprise me if in a year or two such monsters go out of favor and smaller units for some reason become the norm. I guess we can look upon these as the pioneers who are soon to discover which way we humans really want to go.